How democratic was Andrew Jackson? Essay

Andrew capital of Mississippi may have been the most favorite president in the history of United States. Andrew capital of Mississippi was elected as a president for his republic and he was mum getting votes from electors fifteen years after he died. But was Andrew Jackson participatory at all? He didnt democratically morsel in a lot of band like being partial to the poor, not paying attention to the inherent Ameri targets or not audience to Van Buren that caused a big scandal in society.Jackson was born in 1767 on the bounce between North and S egressh Carolina. He was a kid with a wild streak that grew up in a poor family. His childhood was so dramatic and full of events that they made him be venturous and experienced in situations. Jackson was voted for the brass in 1828 and was reelected in 1832. He was said to create a new era of real democracy in America. But like other men, Jackson was not democratic at all and he was also claimed as behaving more like the king.Fir st of all, Andrew Jackson was not democratic because he gave more power to the poor and seemed to be partial to them. While it was democratic that he tried to balance the power between the abundant and the poor besides in this circumstance, he totally took down the rich. In Document 3 which is a political cartoon, Jackson holds a prevent in the left hand and a scepter in the right and tramples on the Federal establishment and The United States brink. It was said that Jackson was fear on the rich and powerful who may cheat the acts of presidential term to their own selfish benefits so he vetoes the Congresss bill to recharger the Bank in July in 1832 and removes the deposit. In fact, Jackson was doing more damage to the bank and he biased against the wealthy men in command. He may have little or no trust in what the Congress and giving medication had deemed to be in the country best interest.In Document 5, Jackson inflame the poor against the rich, The rich and powerful are als o People but Jackson didnt listen to and bring home the bacon their wishes. That was not democratic. In Document 2, Daniel Webster compliments that Andrew Jackson was democratic. It seemed to be contrary to his reply to Andrews Bank veto that Daniel totally criticizes Andrew for turning against the rich. But we can see that Webster claimed that Jackson was the hero of the dirt farmer. It back up that Andrew Jackson is so partial to the poor and scarcely stand for their sides. Jackson did have democratic ideas but his ideas didnt actually benefit all mint. This was undemocratic as it didnt benefit all flock that he took the rich down and just cared for the low class.Additionally, Jackson also acts undemocratically that he didnt include the Native Americans. In Document 3, Andrew looks like a king although he is president because of not taking care of the Native Americans and some tribes. Since a president takes to care for all people, Jackson just cares of part of them and abuse for his power and acts only in his best interests. Based on Document 8, Jackson persuaded the Native American but actually forced them and some tribes to west of the Mississippi. It means that he kicked them out of U.S. Jackson was not democratic because he moves them to such useless land as the land was sunk and poor. Despite looking to the citizens of U.S. well, Jackson wasnt paying attention to the suffering that he was inflicting on Native Americans. This one side shows that Jackson was not a democratic president as many people think he was.The pinnacle of being undemocratic of Jackson was in Document 7, Jackson refused to listen. He liked Swartwout because he had been an early supporter. Jackson prescribed Samuel to the office of the collector of Port of New York sooner of Buren because Swartwout was offered by people more than Van. It is contrary to his democracy of following peoples wishes that he didnt listen to Buren. Andrew went against all reason and showed a great lac k of good judgment when he appointed one of his homies who is a notorious thief. Since Samuel was in office, there was a scandal that Swartwout absconded with $1222705.09. It was a monumental thieving This ended up hurting the country economically and totally affected the common goods. This selfish act was a foolish one.Although Andrew Jackson, as I stated, was an undemocratic president, he was still kind and compassionate and still has little democracy. Based on Document 11, Jackson adopted a child and took care of him. He wrote letters to his wife that he would adopt an Indian son, Lynconya, I send him to my little Andrew and I take to he will adopt him as one of our family. And the letter on December 28th, 1823, Jackson wrote that speciate Lyncoya to read his book and be a good boy and obey you in all things. We can see, Jackson was still democratic as he adopted an Indian boy and also hide him in the family cemetery when he died at age 14. Throughout Jacksons life and his p residency and with the above evidence, Andrew Jackson was not a democratic president at all. He unfairly acted in several circumstances but he was also democratic and kind of adopting an Indian boy. I desist Andrew Jackson was not as democratic as many people thought he was. His march towards people didnt benefit everyone.